Things I Won't Write AboutOctober 21, 2008
I have been getting e-mails asking why I haven't written about certain topics and/or issues. So I thought I'd take this opportunity to discuss five things about which there will likely not be independent ReelThoughts entries. (The economy is not among them, because I will continue to discuss it, especially as it impacts movies, home video, and this website.)
1. The Roger Ebert Blog Entry of October 16, 2008 ("Don't Read Me First"). I don't have a lot to say about this subject. When it comes to writing a review about a movie one has not watched in its entirety, that's a judgment call on the part of the writer, as long as he notes (as Roger did) that what he has written is based on a partial viewing. I would have done things differently and written it up as a commentary without a star rating but, as I indicated, that's a judgment call. I know critics (who shall remain nameless) who have written reviews based on partial viewings and have not informed their readers that they didn't see the entire movie. That's a problem - but what Roger did and how he handled it is legitimate. The bottom line is really a question of semantics: Can something be a proper "review" when the critic has only seen 8 out of 90 minutes of the film? Every point Roger makes in his write-up is valid and the piece is worth reading. My only concern is about how the write-up is labeled.
2. The Election. Like everyone else, I have opinions of the two candidates and their running mates, but I'm not going to air them here. That's really for selfish reasons because a lengthy discourse about the subject would turn off a number of my readers. Plus, this is ReelViews not PoliticalViews. When it comes to a politically based motion picture, it's disingenuous for political opinions not to seep into the review. For Bill Maher's Religulous, for example, I believed it necessary to indicate that I was generally in sympathy with Maher's perspective so that the negative tilt would not be construed as the agenda of someone with a strongly pro-religious ax to grind. I could easily write a long essay about politics and the election, but what would be the point? I think the level of political intolerance is irrationally high in this country and I am not interested in further fanning those flames. I can't promise that ReelViews will be a politics-free zone, but it will be close to one.
3. The Phillies. Yes, I went to a couple of NLCS games. No, I didn't write about them here. That's mainly because about 5% of my readers care to any degree about baseball and less than that are interested in the Phillies. I wrote briefly about this last week, but only as a note to explain the decrease in ReelThoughts entries during the post-season period. Yes, I'm thrilled the Phillies have reached the World Series. I'll be more thrilled if they win. If they lose, let's just say the experience won't be a new one. Joe Carter in 1993 remains an indelible impression. (Although, to be honest, Game 4 that year was even more painful because I was there in person, huddled under my umbrella.) It is, however, more likely that I'll reference the Phillies before the end of October than I will the election. And probably only if they win.
4. High School Musical 3. Did anyone seriously think I was going to review this? It's not being screened for critics (no surprise) and I haven't seen the first two. The film's target demographic doesn't overlap that of my readers. And, based on limited exposure to what I have seen on TV, this isn't something I want to subject myself to. Yes, it will be #1 at the box office this weekend, but that's not a good enough reason for me to plunk down $8 on Friday, even if it is an off-day for the World Series.
5. Saw V. I have seen the previous four Saw movies, although I have only reviewed installments #1 and #4. This is not being screened for critics and I have no plans to see it, either theatrically or when it reaches home video. It's a tired franchise, with new installments being churned out simply because they are profitable. That's a deplorable reason for movies to be made, so the best thing for me to do is get off the gravy train and simply ignore this and any subsequent sequels. I dearly wish filmmakers would embrace the spark of originality and make a horror movie that's not a copy of something familiar, a sequel, or a re-make. I once considered myself to be a fan of horror movies, but there have been so few of quality lately that it's difficult to get excited about any such genre entry, especially if there's a number in the title.
Thanking the Studios
As has been widely publicized recently, studios have decreased the number of films being made available in pre-release screenings for critics. Hardly a week goes by when one or more films is held back from an advance exposure. One might construe ...
By George (Lucas)! He Got It!
Disney doesn’t get it but George did. Despite having paid$4B for Star Wars, Lucasfilm, andeverything that goes with it, Disney doesn’t understand the fundamental reasonwhy the franchise is so beloved and successful – why fans have taken such ...
#2: KING KONG (John Barry)
I am one of the few people who will admit to liking the 1976 version of King Kong. There are three reasons for this. It was the first movie I saw in an indoor movie theater and, as such, it left an imprint on the impressionable mind of a nine-year ...